Politics Insider for Dec. 16, 2021: Feds scrambling over Omicron; Booster shots in Ontario; and no more gathering restrictions for unvaxxed Albertans
The federal government announced a new travel advisory on Wednesday, as news about omicron got scarier, but behind the scenes the feds were scrambling to put in place a new plan to manage travel ahead of the Christmas holidays, Justin Ling writes in Maclean’s.
Sources who spoke to Maclean’s say cabinet was briefed Tuesday by at least two departments on how it might ramp up testing in time for the holiday rush—but both warned the plan to test everyone arriving in Canada’s airports was practically impossible.
Steady as she goes: Jason Kenney announced Wednesday that Alberta will allow more than two families to gather for Christmas and is no longer placing additional gathering restrictions on the un-vaxxed, the Edmonton Journal reports.
Kenney said the limit of 10 adults per indoor gathering total will remain but there will no longer be limits on the number of households that can be included. He said the previous rules that prevented unvaccinated Albertans from gathering were leading to “widespread non-compliance” so those are being eliminated.
Spreading: Patrick Lagacé, writing (translation) in La Presse, which elsewhere featured a report Wednesday night of a hospital outbreak, is unimpressed by provincial guidelines allowing up to 20 people at holiday parties, and offers a personal plan to cut the omicron risk.
Translation: At 10 days before Christmas, the situation being what it is, I personally don’t need the state to tell me how many people I can or cannot host at home. The answer is simple: as few as possible. Not zero. But as few as possible. We open the windows, we ventilate, we have two small parties rather than one medium-large; three rather than two. In short, you flatten the risk curve yourself, notwithstanding government directives.
Travel plans: CP reports that CPC MPs will be free to travel internationally over the holidays while their Liberal and NDP counterparts must stay home, reminding us of last year’s impolitic holiday jaunts. After the government issued a new advisory, Liberal and NDP party bosses have instructed their MPs to stay in Canada, while Erin O’Toole’s office said the advisory offers advice, which means CPC MPs “can continue to travel internationally.”
Against Quebec bashing: Writing in the Post, André Pratte warns that English Canadian objections to Bill 21 will strengthen the hand of Quebec separatists.
All this noise now allows the distinct society’s nationalists to claim that the province is again subject to “Québec bashing.” As always when under “attack,” Quebecers will rally behind their government. Bill 21 will become even more entrenched into Québécois identity. Attempting to amend it, following a Supreme Court decision for example, will be impossible for any future government of the province.
Lack of leadership: In the Star, Althia Raj checks in with Brampton Mayor Patrick Brown and a number of other people who think federal politicians ought to be rushing to the ramparts to defend the Charter.
Pressure: CP has a report on MPs and senators from several parties who are pushing their parties to take a firmer stand.Trudeau’s lament: Justin TrudeautellsSusan Delacourt of the Star that he doesn’t like being criticized by those on his left.
“I expect the progressive parties to come and say, ‘you haven’t done enough, you need to do more,’” Trudeau said. “That’s fine. But to have them turn around and say “you did nothing?’” Though he says he took it personally, he says it’s not a “poor prime minister” lament or a plea for a pat on the back. Trudeau believes the “you did nothing” refrain cuts deeper — it turns people off the idea of government altogether. “It undercuts everything we’re trying to do,” he says, and its logical conclusion is voter apathy.
Two for one: Colby Cosh, writing in the Post, tries to figure out, following in the footsteps of our Paul Wells, why the federal government has two committees on economy, inclusion and climate.
Maybe the belief is that the distinction between the two committees will emerge in time; that it will work itself out naturally. The mandarins of the civil service can belabour both A and B committees with memoranda and briefings, and they’ll eventually develop an instinct for what goes to A and what goes to B. And maybe by the time the Liberals are re-elected, A and B can actually be defined in writing.
Article From: Maclean’s
Author: Stephen Maher
